On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:03:34AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:59:46PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Mikhail Ulyanov
>> >> <mikhail.ulyanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> > + - compatible: should containg one of the following:
>> >> > + - "renesas,jpu-r8a7790" for R-Car H2
>> >> > + - "renesas,jpu-r8a7791" for R-Car M2
>> >> > + - "renesas,jpu-gen2" for R-Car second generation
>> >>
>> >> Isn't "renesas,jpu-gen2" meant as a fallback?
>> >>
>> >> I.e. the DTS should have one of '7790 and '7791, AND the gen2 fallback,
>> >> so we can make the driver match against '7790 and '7791 is we find
>> >> out about an incompatibility.
>> >
>> > Is there a document that clearly states that there is such a thing
>> > as jpu-gen2 in hardware? If not I would prefer not to add a binding for it.
>>
>> We do have a document that describes the "JPEG Processing Unit (JPU)",
>> as found in the following members of the "Second Generation R-Car Series
>> Products": "R-Car H2", "R-Car M2-W", "R-Car M2-N", and "R-Car V2H".
>
> Oh, that is nice :)
>
> From my point of view that ticks a lot of boxes.
> But I wonder if we can come up with a better name than jpu,-gen2.
"jpu-rcar-gen2"?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
