To improve human readability and enable automatic validation, the tuples in the various properties containing interrupt specifiers should be grouped. Fix this by grouping the tuples of "interrupts" and "interrupts-extended" properties using angle brackets. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- v2: - Add Reviewed-by. --- arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu540-c000.dtsi | 21 +++++++++++---------- arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu740-c000.dtsi | 14 +++++++------- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu540-c000.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu540-c000.dtsi index 0655b5c4201d9f71..0caca0ccf6711ded 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu540-c000.dtsi +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu540-c000.dtsi @@ -145,12 +145,12 @@ plic0: interrupt-controller@c000000 { reg = <0x0 0xc000000 0x0 0x4000000>; riscv,ndev = <53>; interrupt-controller; - interrupts-extended = < - &cpu0_intc 0xffffffff - &cpu1_intc 0xffffffff &cpu1_intc 9 - &cpu2_intc 0xffffffff &cpu2_intc 9 - &cpu3_intc 0xffffffff &cpu3_intc 9 - &cpu4_intc 0xffffffff &cpu4_intc 9>; + interrupts-extended = + <&cpu0_intc 0xffffffff>, + <&cpu1_intc 0xffffffff>, <&cpu1_intc 9>, + <&cpu2_intc 0xffffffff>, <&cpu2_intc 9>, + <&cpu3_intc 0xffffffff>, <&cpu3_intc 9>, + <&cpu4_intc 0xffffffff>, <&cpu4_intc 9>; }; prci: clock-controller@10000000 { compatible = "sifive,fu540-c000-prci"; @@ -170,7 +170,8 @@ dma: dma@3000000 { compatible = "sifive,fu540-c000-pdma"; reg = <0x0 0x3000000 0x0 0x8000>; interrupt-parent = <&plic0>; - interrupts = <23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30>; + interrupts = <23>, <24>, <25>, <26>, <27>, <28>, <29>, + <30>; #dma-cells = <1>; }; uart1: serial@10011000 { @@ -243,7 +244,7 @@ pwm0: pwm@10020000 { compatible = "sifive,fu540-c000-pwm", "sifive,pwm0"; reg = <0x0 0x10020000 0x0 0x1000>; interrupt-parent = <&plic0>; - interrupts = <42 43 44 45>; + interrupts = <42>, <43>, <44>, <45>; clocks = <&prci PRCI_CLK_TLCLK>; #pwm-cells = <3>; status = "disabled"; @@ -252,7 +253,7 @@ pwm1: pwm@10021000 { compatible = "sifive,fu540-c000-pwm", "sifive,pwm0"; reg = <0x0 0x10021000 0x0 0x1000>; interrupt-parent = <&plic0>; - interrupts = <46 47 48 49>; + interrupts = <46>, <47>, <48>, <49>; clocks = <&prci PRCI_CLK_TLCLK>; #pwm-cells = <3>; status = "disabled"; @@ -265,7 +266,7 @@ l2cache: cache-controller@2010000 { cache-size = <2097152>; cache-unified; interrupt-parent = <&plic0>; - interrupts = <1 2 3>; + interrupts = <1>, <2>, <3>; reg = <0x0 0x2010000 0x0 0x1000>; }; gpio: gpio@10060000 { diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu740-c000.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu740-c000.dtsi index abbb960f90a00ac2..8464b0e3c88791e1 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu740-c000.dtsi +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu740-c000.dtsi @@ -147,12 +147,12 @@ plic0: interrupt-controller@c000000 { reg = <0x0 0xc000000 0x0 0x4000000>; riscv,ndev = <69>; interrupt-controller; - interrupts-extended = < - &cpu0_intc 0xffffffff - &cpu1_intc 0xffffffff &cpu1_intc 9 - &cpu2_intc 0xffffffff &cpu2_intc 9 - &cpu3_intc 0xffffffff &cpu3_intc 9 - &cpu4_intc 0xffffffff &cpu4_intc 9>; + interrupts-extended = + <&cpu0_intc 0xffffffff>, + <&cpu1_intc 0xffffffff>, <&cpu1_intc 9>, + <&cpu2_intc 0xffffffff>, <&cpu2_intc 9>, + <&cpu3_intc 0xffffffff>, <&cpu3_intc 9>, + <&cpu4_intc 0xffffffff>, <&cpu4_intc 9>; }; prci: clock-controller@10000000 { compatible = "sifive,fu740-c000-prci"; @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ ccache: cache-controller@2010000 { cache-size = <2097152>; cache-unified; interrupt-parent = <&plic0>; - interrupts = <19 21 22 20>; + interrupts = <19>, <21>, <22>, <20>; reg = <0x0 0x2010000 0x0 0x1000>; }; gpio: gpio@10060000 { -- 2.25.1