On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:08:07AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > On 08/26/2014 09:17 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > No, this doesn't make any obvious sense to me at all. Picking normal as > > a default if the hardware reads back off due to overlapping > > impelementation or something *might* make sense but not overwriting the > > hardware state without explicit permission from the machine integration > > is a key goal for the regulator API. > Just to be sure I understood you correctly, what might makes sense to you > then is to set the opmode to normal as default on probe only if off is > read back from the hardware register but leaving the enable function as it > is now using the opmode set on probe? Yes.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
