On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:53:26AM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm reviewing a clock driver [1], and the submitter has deviated from > the defines used by Linux. For example, where Linux might have > > #define CLOCK_FOOBAR 5 > > his driver might have > > #define CLK_FUBAR 6 > > Which means that both the device tree source and the resulting device > tree binary will be different. > > As I understand it, we try to be compatible with Linux on these things. > However, it is unclear to me if include/dt-bindings is also part of > this, or just the things in Documentation/devicetree/bindings. And if it > is, do we need to have compatible sources, compatible binaries, or both? > In general, I think we should try to have the same headers as well, but > is it permitted to allow deviations with reasonable justification? > > --Sean > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/de6e75a083647dfeec3058dd4dcc0419b08e155c.1637285375.git.weijie.gao@xxxxxxxxxxxx/ Adding a few more people to the thread. -- Tom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
