On Mon, Dec 13, 2021, at 04:55, Hector Martin wrote: > On 10/12/2021 01.33, Sven Peter wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021, at 06:50, Hector Martin wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> Just a quick fix for the Apple mailbox compatible. Similar to [1], we >>> intend to use SoC-specific compatibles only for potential quirks, and >>> rely on a generic compatible to allow for forward-compatibility as long >>> as things don't break. >> >> I vaguely remember a brief discussion about this and I think we thought about >> using "t6000-asc", "t8103-asc" in this case since this specific mailbox hardware >> was only introduced in the M1. I think Apple calls this variant ascwrap-v4 >> and m3wrap-v2. >> >> Doing it like you suggested is also fine with me though. > > I think I remember that one... seems this is ascwrap-v4 in t8101 too, so > not quite introduced with M1. But that one doesn't have m3wraps (or > doesn't use them). > > Since Apple do have some kind of sane versioning for these it seems, > maybe we should follow their numbers and call them apple,asc-mailbox-v4 > and apple,m3-mailbox-v2? Sure, sounds good to me. Sven
