Hi Patrick,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:50:20AM +0100, Patrick Rudolph wrote:
> Add a regulator called vcc and update the example.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.yaml | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.yaml
> index bd794cb80c11..5add7db02c0c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.yaml
> @@ -64,6 +64,9 @@ properties:
> description: if present, overrides i2c-mux-idle-disconnect
> $ref: /schemas/mux/mux-controller.yaml#/properties/idle-state
>
> + vcc-supply:
> + description: An optional voltage regulator supplying power to the chip.
The NXP datasheet names the supply VDD, could we use vdd-supply here ? I
also wouldn't call it ooptional (even if it effectively is from a DT
point of view as the property isn't listed as required), given that the
power supply isn't optional for the chip to function. How about the
following ?
vdd-supply:
description: The voltage regulator powering to the VDD supply.
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> required:
> - compatible
> - reg
> @@ -84,6 +87,8 @@ examples:
> #size-cells = <0>;
> reg = <0x74>;
>
> + vcc-supply = <&p3v3>;
> +
> interrupt-parent = <&ipic>;
> interrupts = <17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
> interrupt-controller;
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
