On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 11:09:24PM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 8. Dezember 2021, 16:12:19 CET schrieb Sascha Hauer: > > "vpll" is a misnomer. A clock input to a device should be named after > > the usage in the device, not after the clock that drives it. On the > > rk3568 the same clock is driven by the HPLL. > > To fix that, this patch renames the vpll clock to ref clock. The clock > > name "vpll" is left for compatibility to old device trees. > > Can't we just say that the binding only takes the "ref" name, but > the code still allows "vpll". > > I think I remember Rob suggesting something similar in the past. > > I don't think that we need to keep the binding(-validation) > compatible with old devicetrees, but the kernel itself should stay > compatible. Sounds reasonable. I'll also add a patch changing the in-tree users next round. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
