Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] serial:sunplus-uart:Add Sunplus SoC UART Driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13. 12. 21, 8:10, Hammer Hsieh wrote:
Add Sunplus SoC UART Driver

Signed-off-by: Hammer Hsieh <hammer.hsieh@xxxxxxxxxxx>

...

--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sunplus-uart.c

...

+static void receive_chars(struct uart_port *port)
+{
+	unsigned int lsr = readl(port->membase + SUP_UART_LSR);
+	unsigned int ch, flag;
+
+	do {
+		ch = readl(port->membase + SUP_UART_DATA);
+		flag = TTY_NORMAL;
+		port->icount.rx++;
+
+		if (unlikely(lsr & SUP_UART_LSR_BRK_ERROR_BITS)) {
+			if (lsr & SUP_UART_LSR_BC) {
+				lsr &= ~(SUP_UART_LSR_FE | SUP_UART_LSR_PE);
+				port->icount.brk++;
+				if (uart_handle_break(port))
+					goto ignore_char;
+			} else if (lsr & SUP_UART_LSR_PE) {
+				port->icount.parity++;
+			} else if (lsr & SUP_UART_LSR_FE) {
+				port->icount.frame++;
+			}
+
+			if (lsr & SUP_UART_LSR_OE)
+				port->icount.overrun++;
+
+			if (lsr & SUP_UART_LSR_BC)
+				flag = TTY_BREAK;
+			else if (lsr & SUP_UART_LSR_PE)
+				flag = TTY_PARITY;
+			else if (lsr & SUP_UART_LSR_FE)
+				flag = TTY_FRAME;

Why do you handle these separately and not above?

+		}
+
+		if (port->ignore_status_mask & SUP_DUMMY_READ)
+			goto ignore_char;
+
+		if (uart_handle_sysrq_char(port, ch))
+			goto ignore_char;
+
+		uart_insert_char(port, lsr, SUP_UART_LSR_OE, ch, flag);
+
+ignore_char:
+		lsr = readl(port->membase + SUP_UART_LSR);
+	} while (lsr & SUP_UART_LSR_RX);
+
+	tty_flip_buffer_push(&port->state->port);
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t sunplus_uart_irq(int irq, void *args)
+{
+	struct uart_port *port = (struct uart_port *)args;

No need to cast here.

+	unsigned int isc = readl(port->membase + SUP_UART_ISC);

Shouldn't this be under the spinlock?

And "if (!isc) return IRQ_NONE"?

+	spin_lock(&port->lock);
+
+	if (isc & SUP_UART_ISC_RX)
+		receive_chars(port);
+
+	if (isc & SUP_UART_ISC_TX)
+		transmit_chars(port);
+
+	spin_unlock(&port->lock);
+
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static int sunplus_startup(struct uart_port *port)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+	unsigned int isc;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = request_irq(port->irq, sunplus_uart_irq, 0, "sunplus_uart", port);

Cannot the interrupt be shared?

+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
+
+	isc |= SUP_UART_ISC_RXM;
+	writel(isc, port->membase + SUP_UART_ISC);
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void sunplus_shutdown(struct uart_port *port)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
+	writel(0, port->membase + SUP_UART_ISC);

What bus is this -- posting?

+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
+
+	free_irq(port->irq, port);
+}

...

+static void sunplus_release_port(struct uart_port *port)
+{
+}
+
+static int sunplus_request_port(struct uart_port *port)
+{
+	return 0;
+}

These two are optional -- no need to provide them.

regards,
--
js
suse labs



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux