The 12/09/2021 13:59, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 10:46:14AM +0100, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > +int lan966x_vlan_port_set_vid(struct lan966x_port *port, u16 vid,
> > + bool pvid, bool untagged)
> > +{
> > + struct lan966x *lan966x = port->lan966x;
> > +
> > + /* Egress vlan classification */
> > + if (untagged && port->vid != vid) {
> > + if (port->vid) {
> > + dev_err(lan966x->dev,
> > + "Port already has a native VLAN: %d\n",
> > + port->vid);
> > + return -EBUSY;
>
> Are you interested in supporting the use case from 0da1a1c48911 ("net:
> mscc: ocelot: allow a config where all bridge VLANs are egress-untagged")?
> Because it would be good if the driver was structured that way from the
> get-go instead of patching it later.
Currently not, but I don't know what will happen in 1 month or 6
months.
>
> > + }
> > + port->vid = vid;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Default ingress vlan classification */
> > + if (pvid)
> > + port->pvid = vid;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
--
/Horatiu
