Hi Roger,
rogerq@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Thu, 9 Dec 2021 12:08:07 +0200:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> On 09/12/2021 11:42, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > robh@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Mon, 6 Dec 2021 11:42:09 -0600:
> >
> >> With 'unevaluatedProperties' support implemented, the TI GPMC example
> >> has a warning:
> >>
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ti,gpmc.example.dt.yaml: nand@0,0: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('rb-gpios' was unexpected)
> >>
> >> Add the missing definition for 'rb-gpios'.
> >
> > rb-gpios is already defined in nand-controller.yaml. I seems like the
> > real problem is that this file does not refer to it. Can you update the
> > fix?
>
> I don't think we can refer to nand-controller.yaml right now as we are not
> fully compatible with it yet. Please see examples below.
This is a *very* wrong way of defining a NAND setup. I will take the
patch to silence the warning, but please convert this representation to
the 'new' one. I believe on the driver side it should not be too
complicated to support having a few of these properties moved to a NAND
chip subnode and still support the below binding. Just be very clear
that if the legacy bindings are used, only a single chip is supported.
> ti,gpmc-nand example:
>
> nand@0,0 {
> compatible = "ti,omap2-nand";
> reg = <0 0 4>; /* device IO registers */
> interrupt-parent = <&gpmc>;
> interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>, /* fifoevent */
> <1 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>; /* termcount */
> ti,nand-xfer-type = "prefetch-dma";
> ti,nand-ecc-opt = "bch16";
> ti,elm-id = <&elm>;
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
>
> /* NAND generic properties */
> nand-bus-width = <8>;
> rb-gpios = <&gpmc 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* gpmc_wait0 */
>
> /* GPMC properties*/
> gpmc,device-width = <1>;
>
> partition@0 {
> label = "NAND.SPL";
> reg = <0x00000000 0x00040000>;
> };
> partition@1 {
> label = "NAND.SPL.backup1";
> reg = <0x00040000 0x00040000>;
> };
> };
>
>
> nand-controller example:
>
> nand-controller {
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> cs-gpios = <0>, <&gpioA 1>; /* A single native CS is available */
>
> /* controller specific properties */
>
> nand@0 {
> reg = <0>; /* Native CS */
> nand-use-soft-ecc-engine;
> nand-ecc-algo = "bch";
>
> /* controller specific properties */
> };
>
> nand@1 {
> reg = <1>; /* GPIO CS */
> };
> };
>
>
> >
> > While at it you might also want to drop the rb-gpios property from
> > ingenic,nand.yaml, which also defines it a second time.
> >
> >> Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ti,gpmc-nand.yaml | 5 +++++
> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ti,gpmc-nand.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ti,gpmc-nand.yaml
> >> index beb26b9bcfb2..1c280f52baa0 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ti,gpmc-nand.yaml
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ti,gpmc-nand.yaml
> >> @@ -53,6 +53,11 @@ properties:
> >> enum: [8, 16]
> >> default: 8
> >>
> >> + rb-gpios:
> >> + description:
> >> + GPIO connection to R/B signal from NAND chip
> >> + maxItems: 1
> >> +
> >> patternProperties:
> >> "@[0-9a-f]+$":
> >> $ref: "/schemas/mtd/partitions/partition.yaml"
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Miquèl
> >
>
> cheers,
> -roger
>
Thanks,
Miquèl
