Hi,
* Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> [211027 12:19]:
> 20.10.2021 02:40, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> > Vendor prefix shouldn't start with capital letter. The Elpida Memory
> > compatible was never used in practice, hence just correct the compatible.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi
> > index d87ee4794f83..9698801cbcfb 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi
> > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
> >
> > / {
> > elpida_ECB240ABACN: lpddr2 {
> > - compatible = "Elpida,ECB240ABACN","jedec,lpddr2-s4";
> > + compatible = "elpida,ECB240ABACN","jedec,lpddr2-s4";
> > density = <2048>;
> > io-width = <32>;
> >
> >
>
> This patch should go via OMAP tree since there is only OMAP board which
> uses this dtsi. To make it more clear, "elpida" variant is now
> documented in the bindings [1][2].
>
> [1]
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=9e17f71e9c334f14ad6a8ec3edc09c7a4244e12f
>
> [2]
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=001b8b2594db4ea24fbea4c161e665f858917fce
>
> If there is no interest in taking the patch via OMAP tree, then it may
> go via the DT git tree. Rob, you should pick it up then.
Applying into omap-for-v5.17/dt thanks.
Regards,
Tony
