Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] dt-bindings: pci: Convert iProc PCIe to YAML

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 4:21 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:32 AM Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 12/8/21 5:44 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Tue, 07 Dec 2021 20:04:32 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > >> Conver the iProc PCIe controller Device Tree binding to YAML now that
> > >> all DTS in arch/arm and arch/arm64 have been fixed to be compliant.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >> ---
> > >>  .../bindings/pci/brcm,iproc-pcie.txt          | 133 -------------
> > >>  .../bindings/pci/brcm,iproc-pcie.yaml         | 176 ++++++++++++++++++
> > >>  2 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 133 deletions(-)
> > >>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,iproc-pcie.txt
> > >>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,iproc-pcie.yaml
> > >>
> > >
> > > Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
> > > following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
> > > incorrect. These may not be new warnings.
> > >
> > > Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
> > > This will change in the future.
> > >
> > > Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1565076
> > >
> > >
> > > pcie@18012000: msi-controller: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
> > >       arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm53340-ubnt-unifi-switch8.dt.yaml
> > >       arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm911360_entphn.dt.yaml
> > >       arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm911360k.dt.yaml
> > >       arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958300k.dt.yaml
> > >       arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958305k.dt.yaml
> > >       arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958522er.dt.yaml
> > >       arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958525er.dt.yaml
> > >       arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958525xmc.dt.yaml
> > >       arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958622hr.dt.yaml
> > >       arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958623hr.dt.yaml
> > >       arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625hr.dt.yaml
> > >       arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625k.dt.yaml
> > >       arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx64-a0.dt.yaml
> > >       arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx64.dt.yaml
> > >       arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx64w-a0.dt.yaml
> > >       arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx64w.dt.yaml
> > >       arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx65.dt.yaml
> > >       arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625-meraki-mx65w.dt.yaml
> > >       arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm988312hr.dt.yaml
> >
> > Those would mean that the binding patch was applied without the DTS
> > patches earlier in the series?
>
> Right. I generally don't look at dts patches, but I did look at these
> and don't see how this one is fixed (nor caused):

Note that unevaluatedProperties is only enabled in the dtschema main branch.

Rob



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux