On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:14:53PM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <Li.Xiubo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl-sai.txt | 8 ++++----
> sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c | 6 +++---
> sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl-sai.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl-sai.txt
> index aed1f21..e25ef38 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl-sai.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl-sai.txt
> @@ -20,9 +20,9 @@ Required properties:
> See ../pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt for details of the property values.
> - big-endian: Boolean property, required if all the SAI device registers
> are big-endian rather than little-endian.
> -- big-endian-data: If this property is absent, the little endian mode will
> - be in use as default, or the big endian mode will be in use for all the
> - fifo data.
> +- msb-first: Configures whether the LSB or the MSB is transmitted first for
> + the fifo data. If this property is absent, the LSB is transmitted first as
> + default, or the MSB is transmitted first.
> - fsl,sai-synchronous-rx: This is a boolean property. If present, indicating
> that SAI will work in the synchronous mode (sync Tx with Rx) which means
> both the transimitter and receiver will send and receive data by following
> @@ -53,5 +53,5 @@ sai2: sai@40031000 {
> dmas = <&edma0 0 VF610_EDMA_MUXID0_SAI2_TX>,
> <&edma0 0 VF610_EDMA_MUXID0_SAI2_RX>;
> big-endian;
> - big-endian-data;
> + msb-first;
> };
> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c
> index a6eb784..4e48431 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c
> @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static int fsl_sai_set_dai_fmt_tr(struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai,
> bool tx = fsl_dir == FSL_FMT_TRANSMITTER;
> u32 val_cr2 = 0, val_cr4 = 0;
>
> - if (!sai->big_endian_data)
> + if (!sai->is_msb_first)
> val_cr4 |= FSL_SAI_CR4_MF;
IIRC, MF stands for 'MSB First' but the condition is !is_msb_first..
And also we can't not simply inverse the condition here since those
platforms without the original 'big_endian_data' property will be
broken unless they add the new 'is_msb_first' into the DT bindings,
which is, however, a violation due to breaking the old bindings.
So I guess is_lsb_first might be better here?
And actually, Xiubo, what's your purpose to add this patch? I can't
see any commit comments to explain the reason. So could you please
say something about it?
Thanks
Nicolin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
