On 07/12/2021 16:54, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 3:12 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 06/12/2021 18:42, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> With 'unevaluatedProperties' support implemented, the TI GPMC example
>>> has a warning:
>>>
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ti,gpmc-onenand.example.dt.yaml: memory-controller@6e000000: onenand@0,0: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('compatible', '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'partition@0', 'partition@100000' were unexpected)
>>>
>>> The child node definition for GPMC is not a complete binding, so specifying
>>> 'unevaluatedProperties: false' for it is not correct and should be
>>> dropped.
>>>
>>> Fixup the unnecessary 'allOf' while we're here.
>>>
>>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ti,gpmc.yaml | 5 +----
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Looks good. Rob, do you want to take it via your tree or I should handle it?
>
> I'll take it given there's also the somewhat related "dt-bindings:
> mtd: ti,gpmc-nand: Add missing 'rb-gpios'"
Sure, then:
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
