On Sun 05 Dec 21:39 PST 2021, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 01-12-21, 16:03, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >
> > On 01.12.2021 08:29, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > This add based DTSI for SM8450 SoC and includes base description of
> > > CPUs, GCC, RPMHCC, UART, interuupt-controller which helps to boot to
> > > shell with console on boards with this SoC
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 476 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 476 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..d838283bde4b
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,476 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2021, Linaro Limited
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> > > +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sm8450.h>
> > > +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h>
> > > +#include <dt-bindings/soc/qcom,rpmh-rsc.h>
> > > +
> > > +/ {
> > > + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> > > +
> > > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > > +
> > > + chosen { };
> > > +
> > > + clocks {
> > > + xo_board: xo-board {
> > > + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> > > + #clock-cells = <0>;
> > > + clock-frequency = <76800000>;
> > > + clock-output-names = "xo_board";
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + sleep_clk: sleep-clk {
> > > + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> > > + clock-frequency = <32000>;
> > > + #clock-cells = <0>;
> > > + };
> >
> > No clock-output-names for this one?
>
> This should have one, will fix and update in v2
No need, the clock's name is not significant for anything beyond
debugging. So if you're going to change something let it be dropping the
clock-output-names from &xo_board.
Thanks,
Bjorn
> >
> >
> > Other than that:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for the review!
>
> --
> ~Vinod
