On 06/12/2021 12:52, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 06:54:54PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote: >> Yong Wu (14): >> dt-binding: mediatek: Get rid of mediatek, larb for multimedia HW >> iommu/mediatek-v1: Free the existed fwspec if the master dev already >> has >> iommu/mediatek: Return ENODEV if the device is NULL >> iommu/mediatek: Add probe_defer for smi-larb >> iommu/mediatek: Add device_link between the consumer and the larb >> devices >> media: mtk-jpeg: Get rid of mtk_smi_larb_get/put >> media: mtk-mdp: Get rid of mtk_smi_larb_get/put >> drm/mediatek: Get rid of mtk_smi_larb_get/put >> media: mtk-vcodec: Get rid of mtk_smi_larb_get/put >> media: mtk-vcodec: dec: Remove mtk_vcodec_release_dec_pm >> media: mtk-vcodec: enc: Remove mtk_vcodec_release_enc_pm >> memory: mtk-smi: Get rid of mtk_smi_larb_get/put >> arm: dts: mediatek: Get rid of mediatek, larb for MM nodes >> arm64: dts: mediatek: Get rid of mediatek, larb for MM nodes >> >> Yongqiang Niu (1): >> drm/mediatek: Add pm runtime support for ovl and rdma > > What is the plan for merging this? If Matthias has no objections I can > take the iommu-parts, or will this go through another tree? I think it might be easiest if it is all going through the media subsystem (except for the dts patches, we don't handle those unless specifically requested to do so). I need a resend for jpeg bindings txt to yaml conversion series first, though. This time with the linux-media mailinglist included :-) I would need your Ack for the iommu patches as well, of course. Regards, Hans
