Hi Rob, are you fine with these bindings? On 02/12/2021 15:42, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 17:41, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [ ... ] > This looks good to me, feel free to add: > > Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Kind regards > Uffe > >> --- >> V3: >> - Removed required property 'compatible' >> - Removed powerzone-cells from the topmost node >> - Removed powerzone-cells from cpus 'consumers' in example >> - Set additionnal property to false >> V2: >> - Added pattern properties and stick to powerzone-* >> - Added required property compatible and powerzone-cells >> - Added additionnal property >> - Added compatible >> - Renamed to 'powerzones' >> - Added missing powerzone-cells to the topmost node >> - Fixed errors reported by 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' >> V1: Initial post >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/power/powerzones.yaml | 97 +++++++++++++++++++ [ ... ] -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog