On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 02:28PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 08/20/2014 10:41 PM, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> > Match the naming pattern of all other SMP ops and rename
> > zynq_platform_cpu_die --> zynq_cpu_die.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-zynq/platsmp.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/platsmp.c
> > index 04e578718aa2..95933c5e70e1 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/platsmp.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/platsmp.c
> > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static int zynq_cpu_kill(unsigned cpu)
> > *
> > * Called with IRQs disabled
> > */
> > -static void zynq_platform_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
> > +static void zynq_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
> > {
> > zynq_slcr_cpu_state_write(cpu, true);
> >
> > @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ struct smp_operations zynq_smp_ops __initdata = {
> > .smp_boot_secondary = zynq_boot_secondary,
> > .smp_secondary_init = zynq_secondary_init,
> > #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> > - .cpu_die = zynq_platform_cpu_die,
> > + .cpu_die = zynq_cpu_die,
> > .cpu_kill = zynq_cpu_kill,
> > #endif
> > };
>
> Will be good if you can move fix that kernel-doc format for this function
> too. It is just nice to have thing.
All these SMP-ops should be documented in the header defining that
struct, shouldn't they?
Sören
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
