On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 7:33 AM Vaittinen, Matti <Matti.Vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hmm. Fair enough. Maybe instead of providing 'temperature range where > degradation is constant' we should simply support providing the > data-points. Eg, an array of known > temperature-[degradation/change]-from-[designed/full]-capacity pairs and > leave selecting the best fitting model to the software. Linear > interpolation is simple, and may suffice for cases where we have enough > of data-points - but you are correct that there probably are better > alternatives. Nice thing is software is that it can be changed over time > - so even implementing it with linear approach means opening a room for > further improvements ;) Yeah someone will implement spline interpolation in the kernel one day I bet... > Well, I don't know how constant such degradation is over time. I just > guess it is not constant but might be proportional to age-compensated > capacity rather than the designed capacity. It'd be nice to use correct > approximation of reality in device-tree... IIUC the degradation of a battery is related to number of full charge cycles, i.e. the times that the battery has been emptied and recharged fully. This is of course never happening in practice, so e.g. two recharge cycles from 50% to 100% is one full charge cycle. So you integrate this over time (needs to be saved in a file system or flash if the battery does not say it itself). This measures how much the lithium ions have moved around in the electrolyte and thus how much chemical interaction the battery has seen. Then the relationship between complete charge cycles and capacity degradation is certainly also going to be something nonlinear so it needs manufacturer data for the battery. > By the way, I was reading the ab8500 fuel-gauge driver as you suggested. > So, if I am correct, you used the battery internal resistance + current > to compute the voltage-drop caused by battery internal resistance. This > for sure improves the accuracy when we assume VBAT can be used as OCV. Yes this is how it is done. With a few measurements averaged to iron out the noise. > Epilogue: > In general, I see bunch of power-supply drivers scheduling work for > running some battery-measurements. Some do this periodically (I think > the ab8500 did this although I lost the track when I tried to see in > which case the periodic work was not scheduled - and maybe for > fuel-gauging) or after an IRQ is triggered (for example to see if change > indication should be sent). Yes there is some tight community of electronic engineers who read the right articles and design these things. We don't know them :( > I think we could simplify a few drivers if the core provided some helper > thread (like the simple-gauge) which could be woken by drivers (to do > fuel-gauge operations, or to just conditionally send the change > notification). I think so too, I don't think they are very rocket science once the right abstractions fall out. Yours, Linus Walleij
