[resending after having sorted my email config...]
Hi Shawn,
On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 09:35:29 +0000,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Qualcomm SoCs based on the RPM architecture have a MSM Power Manager (MPM)
> in always-on domain. In addition to managing resources during sleep, the
> hardware also has an interrupt controller that monitors the interrupts
> when the system is asleep, wakes up the APSS when one of these interrupts
> occur and replays it to GIC after it becomes operational.
>
> It adds an irqchip driver for this interrupt controller, and here are
> some notes about it.
>
> - For given SoC, a fixed number of MPM pins are supported, e.g. 96 pins
> on QCM2290. Each of these MPM pins can be either a MPM_GIC pin or
> a MPM_GPIO pin. The mapping between MPM_GIC pin and GIC interrupt
> is defined by SoC, as well as the mapping between MPM_GPIO pin and
> GPIO number. The former mapping can be found as the SoC data in this
> MPM driver, while the latter can be found as the msm_gpio_wakeirq_map[]
> in TLMM driver.
>
> - Two irq domains are created for a single irq_chip to handle MPM_GIC
> and MPM_GPIO pins respectively, i.e. MPM_GIC domain and MPM_GPIO domain.
> The former is a child domain of GIC irq domain, while the latter is
> a parent domain of TLMM/GPIO irq domain.
>
> - All the register settings are done by APSS on the an internal memory
> region called vMPM, and RPM will flush them into hardware after it
> receives a mailbox/IPC notification from APSS.
>
> - When SoC gets awake from sleep mode, the driver will receive an
> interrupt from RPM, so that it can replay interrupt for particular
> polarity.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 8 +
> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/irqchip/qcom-mpm.c | 487 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 496 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/qcom-mpm.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> index 7038957f4a77..e126b19190ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> @@ -430,6 +430,14 @@ config QCOM_PDC
> Power Domain Controller driver to manage and configure wakeup
> IRQs for Qualcomm Technologies Inc (QTI) mobile chips.
>
> +config QCOM_MPM
> + bool "QCOM MPM"
Can't be built as a module?
> + depends on ARCH_QCOM
> + select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
> + help
> + MSM Power Manager driver to manage and configure wakeup
> + IRQs for Qualcomm Technologies Inc (QTI) mobile chips.
> +
> config CSKY_MPINTC
> bool
> depends on CSKY
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> index c1f611cbfbf8..0e2e10467e28 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MESON_IRQ_GPIO) += irq-meson-gpio.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_GOLDFISH_PIC) += irq-goldfish-pic.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_NDS32) += irq-ativic32.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_PDC) += qcom-pdc.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_MPM) += qcom-mpm.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_CSKY_MPINTC) += irq-csky-mpintc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_CSKY_APB_INTC) += irq-csky-apb-intc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_INTC) += irq-riscv-intc.o
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/qcom-mpm.c b/drivers/irqchip/qcom-mpm.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1880c734155f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/qcom-mpm.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,487 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2021, Linaro Limited
> + * Copyright (c) 2010-2020, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * vMPM register layout:
> + *
> + * 31 0
> + * +--------------------------------+
> + * | TIMER0 | 0x00
> + * +--------------------------------+
> + * | TIMER1 | 0x04
> + * +--------------------------------+
> + * | ENABLE0 | 0x08
> + * +--------------------------------+
> + * | ... | ...
> + * +--------------------------------+
> + * | ENABLEn |
> + * +--------------------------------+
> + * | FALLING_EDGE0 |
> + * +--------------------------------+
> + * | ... |
> + * +--------------------------------+
> + * | STATUSn |
> + * +--------------------------------+
> + *
> + * n = DIV_ROUND_UP(pin_num, 32)
> + *
> + */
> +#define MPM_REG_ENABLE 0
> +#define MPM_REG_FALLING_EDGE 1
> +#define MPM_REG_RISING_EDGE 2
> +#define MPM_REG_POLARITY 3
> +#define MPM_REG_STATUS 4
> +
> +#define MPM_NO_PARENT_IRQ ~0UL
> +
> +/* MPM pin and its GIC hwirq */
> +struct mpm_pin {
> + int pin;
> + irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
> +};
> +
> +struct mpm_data {
> + unsigned int pin_num;
> + const struct mpm_pin *gic_pins;
> +};
> +
> +struct qcom_mpm_priv {
> + void __iomem *base;
> + spinlock_t lock;
> + struct mbox_client mbox_client;
> + struct mbox_chan *mbox_chan;
> + const struct mpm_data *data;
> + unsigned int reg_stride;
> +
> + /* MPM pin to Linux irq number */
> + unsigned int *pin_to_irq;
> +};
> +
> +static inline u32
> +qcom_mpm_read(struct qcom_mpm_priv *priv, unsigned int reg, unsigned int index)
> +{
> + unsigned int offset = (reg * priv->reg_stride + index + 2) * 4;
> +
> + return readl(priv->base + offset);
Why the non-relaxed accessors?
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +qcom_mpm_write(struct qcom_mpm_priv *priv, unsigned int reg,
> + unsigned int index, u32 val)
> +{
> + unsigned int offset = (reg * priv->reg_stride + index + 2) * 4;
> + u32 r_val;
> +
> + writel(val, priv->base + offset);
> +
> + do {
> + r_val = readl(priv->base + offset);
> + udelay(5);
> + } while (r_val != val);
What? Is this waiting for a bit to clear? Why isn't this one of the
read*_poll_timeout*() function instead? Surely you can't wait forever
here.
> +}
> +
> +static inline void qcom_mpm_enable_irq(struct irq_data *d, bool en)
> +{
> + struct qcom_mpm_priv *priv = d->domain->host_data;
This really should be stored in d->chip_data.
> + int pin = d->hwirq;
> + unsigned int index = pin / 32;
> + unsigned int shift = pin % 32;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + priv->pin_to_irq[pin] = d->irq;
This makes no sense. This is only reinventing the very notion of an
irq domain, which is to lookup the Linux interrupt based on a context
and a signal number.
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
This must be a raw spinlock.
> +
> + val = qcom_mpm_read(priv, MPM_REG_ENABLE, index);
> + if (en)
> + val |= 1 << shift;
> + else
> + val &= ~(1 << shift);
Use BIT(shift).
> + qcom_mpm_write(priv, MPM_REG_ENABLE, index, val);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static void qcom_mpm_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + qcom_mpm_enable_irq(d, false);
> +
> + if (d->parent_data)
> + irq_chip_mask_parent(d);
> +}
> +
> +static void qcom_mpm_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + qcom_mpm_enable_irq(d, true);
> +
> + if (d->parent_data)
> + irq_chip_unmask_parent(d);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +mpm_set_type(struct qcom_mpm_priv *priv, bool set, unsigned int reg,
> + unsigned int index, unsigned int shift)
> +{
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = qcom_mpm_read(priv, reg, index);
> + if (set)
> + val |= 1 << shift;
> + else
> + val &= ~(1 << shift);
> + qcom_mpm_write(priv, reg, index, val);
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_mpm_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> +{
> + struct qcom_mpm_priv *priv = d->domain->host_data;
> + int pin = d->hwirq;
> + unsigned int index = pin / 32;
> + unsigned int shift = pin % 32;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> +
> + mpm_set_type(priv, (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING) ? 1 : 0,
You have a bool type as the second parameter. Why the convoluted ?:
operator?
> + MPM_REG_RISING_EDGE, index, shift);
> + mpm_set_type(priv, (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING) ? 1 : 0,
> + MPM_REG_FALLING_EDGE, index, shift);
> + mpm_set_type(priv, (type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH) ? 1 : 0,
> + MPM_REG_POLARITY, index, shift);
Why does this mean for an edge interrupt?
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> +
> + if (!d->parent_data)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH)
> + type = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING;
> +
> + if (type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_MASK)
> + type = IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH;
> +
> + return irq_chip_set_type_parent(d, type);
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_chip qcom_mpm_chip = {
> + .name = "mpm",
> + .irq_eoi = irq_chip_eoi_parent,
> + .irq_mask = qcom_mpm_mask,
> + .irq_disable = qcom_mpm_mask,
No. If disable is really mask, then you only need mask.
> + .irq_unmask = qcom_mpm_unmask,
> + .irq_retrigger = irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy,
> + .irq_set_type = qcom_mpm_set_type,
> + .flags = IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND | IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE,
> + .irq_set_affinity = irq_chip_set_affinity_parent,
nit: please align the members vertically.
> +};
> +
> +static irq_hw_number_t get_parent_hwirq(struct qcom_mpm_priv *priv, int pin)
> +{
> + const struct mpm_pin *gic_pins = priv->data->gic_pins;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; gic_pins[i].pin >= 0; i++) {
> + int p = gic_pins[i].pin;
> +
> + if (p < 0)
> + break;
> +
> + if (p == pin)
> + return gic_pins[i].hwirq;
> + }
> +
> + return MPM_NO_PARENT_IRQ;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +qcom_mpm_translate(struct irq_domain *domain, struct irq_fwspec *fwspec,
> + unsigned long *hwirq, unsigned int *type)
> +{
> + if (is_of_node(fwspec->fwnode)) {
> + if (fwspec->param_count != 2)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + *hwirq = fwspec->param[0];
> + *type = fwspec->param[1] & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
This is a copy of irq_domain_translate_twocell().
> +
> +static int qcom_mpm_gic_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> + unsigned int nr_irqs, void *data)
> +{
> + struct qcom_mpm_priv *priv = domain->host_data;
> + struct irq_fwspec *fwspec = data;
> + struct irq_fwspec parent_fwspec;
> + irq_hw_number_t parent_hwirq;
> + irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
> + unsigned int type;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = qcom_mpm_translate(domain, fwspec, &hwirq, &type);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain, virq, hwirq,
> + &qcom_mpm_chip, NULL);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + parent_hwirq = get_parent_hwirq(priv, hwirq);
> + if (parent_hwirq == MPM_NO_PARENT_IRQ)
> + return irq_domain_disconnect_hierarchy(domain->parent, virq);
> +
> + if (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH)
> + type = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING;
> +
> + if (type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_MASK)
> + type = IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH;
> +
> + parent_fwspec.fwnode = domain->parent->fwnode;
> + parent_fwspec.param_count = 3;
> + parent_fwspec.param[0] = 0;
> + parent_fwspec.param[1] = parent_hwirq;
> + parent_fwspec.param[2] = type;
> +
> + return irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs,
> + &parent_fwspec);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops qcom_mpm_gic_ops = {
> + .alloc = qcom_mpm_gic_alloc,
> + .free = irq_domain_free_irqs_common,
> + .translate = qcom_mpm_translate,
Same nit as above.
> +};
> +
> +static int qcom_mpm_gpio_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> + unsigned int nr_irqs, void *data)
> +{
> + struct irq_fwspec *fwspec = data;
> + unsigned int type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
> + irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = qcom_mpm_translate(domain, fwspec, &hwirq, &type);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain, virq, hwirq,
> + &qcom_mpm_chip, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_mpm_gpio_domain_select(struct irq_domain *domain,
> + struct irq_fwspec *fwspec,
> + enum irq_domain_bus_token bus_token)
> +{
> + return bus_token == DOMAIN_BUS_WAKEUP;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops qcom_mpm_gpio_ops = {
> + .select = qcom_mpm_gpio_domain_select,
> + .alloc = qcom_mpm_gpio_alloc,
> + .free = irq_domain_free_irqs_common,
> + .translate = qcom_mpm_translate,
> +};
> +
> +/* Triggered by RPM when system resumes from deep sleep */
> +static irqreturn_t qcom_mpm_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct qcom_mpm_priv *priv = dev_id;
> + unsigned long enable, pending;
> + int i, j;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < priv->reg_stride; i++) {
> + enable = qcom_mpm_read(priv, MPM_REG_ENABLE, i);
> + pending = qcom_mpm_read(priv, MPM_REG_STATUS, i);
> + pending &= enable;
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(j, &pending, 32) {
> + unsigned int pin = 32 * i + j;
> + int irq = priv->pin_to_irq[pin];
> + struct irq_desc *desc = irq ? irq_to_desc(irq) : NULL;
How can this be 0 if you have masked out the disabled interrupts?
> +
> + if (desc && !irqd_is_level_type(&desc->irq_data))
> + irq_set_irqchip_state(irq,
> + IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING, true);
> +
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_mpm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct irq_domain *parent_domain, *mpm_gic_domain, *mpm_gpio_domain;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> + struct device_node *parent = of_irq_find_parent(np);
> + struct qcom_mpm_priv *priv;
> + unsigned int pin_num;
> + int irq;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* See comments in platform_irqchip_probe() */
> + if (parent && !irq_find_matching_host(parent, DOMAIN_BUS_ANY))
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
So why aren't you using that infrastructure?
> +
> + priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!priv)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + priv->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> + if (!priv->data)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + pin_num = priv->data->pin_num;
> + priv->pin_to_irq = devm_kcalloc(dev, pin_num, sizeof(*priv->pin_to_irq),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!priv)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + priv->reg_stride = DIV_ROUND_UP(pin_num, 32);
> + spin_lock_init(&priv->lock);
> +
> + priv->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> + if (!priv->base)
> + return PTR_ERR(priv->base);
> +
> + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (irq < 0)
> + return irq;
> +
> + parent_domain = irq_find_host(parent);
> + if (!parent_domain) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to find MPM parent domain\n");
> + return -ENXIO;
> + }
> +
> + mpm_gic_domain = irq_domain_create_hierarchy(parent_domain, 0, pin_num,
> + of_node_to_fwnode(np), &qcom_mpm_gic_ops, priv);
> + if (!mpm_gic_domain) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to create GIC domain\n");
The message is pretty misleading.
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + mpm_gpio_domain = irq_domain_create_linear(of_node_to_fwnode(np),
> + pin_num, &qcom_mpm_gpio_ops, priv);
> + if (!mpm_gpio_domain) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to create GPIO domain\n");
> + goto remove_gic_domain;
> + }
> +
> + irq_domain_update_bus_token(mpm_gpio_domain, DOMAIN_BUS_WAKEUP);
> +
> + priv->mbox_client.dev = dev;
> + priv->mbox_chan = mbox_request_channel(&priv->mbox_client, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(priv->mbox_chan)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->mbox_chan);
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to acquire IPC channel: %d\n", ret);
> + goto remove_gpio_domain;
Why don't you request this first, before all the allocations?
> + }
> +
> + ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, qcom_mpm_handler,
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND,
> + "qcom_mpm", priv);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to request irq: %d\n", ret);
> + goto free_mbox;
> + }
> +
> + dev_set_drvdata(dev, priv);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +free_mbox:
> + mbox_free_channel(priv->mbox_chan);
> +remove_gpio_domain:
> + irq_domain_remove(mpm_gpio_domain);
> +remove_gic_domain:
> + irq_domain_remove(mpm_gic_domain);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int __maybe_unused qcom_mpm_suspend_late(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct qcom_mpm_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < priv->reg_stride; i++)
> + qcom_mpm_write(priv, MPM_REG_STATUS, i, 0);
> +
> + /* Notify RPM to write vMPM into HW */
> + ret = mbox_send_message(priv->mbox_chan, NULL);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __maybe_unused qcom_mpm_resume_early(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + /* Nothing to do for now */
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops qcom_mpm_pm_ops = {
> + SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(qcom_mpm_suspend_late,
> + qcom_mpm_resume_early)
> +};
> +
> +/* Taken from downstream qcom-mpm-scuba.c with hwirq number minus 32 */
So is that a full description? Or are we only hoping that this is good
enough?
> +const struct mpm_pin qcm2290_gic_pins[] = {
> + { 2, 275 }, /* tsens0_tsens_upper_lower_int */
> + { 5, 296 }, /* lpass_irq_out_sdc */
> + { 12, 422 }, /* b3_lfps_rxterm_irq */
> + { 24, 79 }, /* bi_px_lpi_1_aoss_mx */
> + { 86, 183 }, /* mpm_wake,spmi_m */
> + { 90, 260 }, /* eud_p0_dpse_int_mx */
> + { 91, 260 }, /* eud_p0_dmse_int_mx */
> + { -1 },
> +};
> +
> +const struct mpm_data qcm2290_data = {
> + .pin_num = 96,
> + .gic_pins = qcm2290_gic_pins,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id qcom_mpm_match_table[] = {
> + { .compatible = "qcom,qcm2290-mpm", &qcm2290_data, },
> + { },
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_driver qcom_mpm_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "qcom_mpm",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .of_match_table = qcom_mpm_match_table,
> + .pm = &qcom_mpm_pm_ops,
> + .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
> + },
> + .probe = qcom_mpm_probe,
> +};
> +builtin_platform_driver(qcom_mpm_driver)
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. MSM Power Manager");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
