Hi Billy,
On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 10:43 +0800, Billy Tsai wrote:
[...]
> +static int aspeed_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + int ret;
> + struct aspeed_pwm_data *priv;
> + struct device_node *np;
> + struct platform_device *parent_dev;
> +
> + priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!priv)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + np = pdev->dev.parent->of_node;
> + if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "aspeed,ast2600-pwm-tach"))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV,
> + "Unsupported pwm device binding\n");
> +
> + priv->regmap = syscon_node_to_regmap(np);
> + if (IS_ERR(priv->regmap))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(priv->regmap),
> + "Couldn't get regmap\n");
> +
> + parent_dev = of_find_device_by_node(np);
> + priv->clk = devm_clk_get(&parent_dev->dev, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(priv->clk))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(priv->clk),
> + "Couldn't get clock\n");
> +
> + priv->reset = devm_reset_control_get_shared(&parent_dev->dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(priv->reset)) {
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(priv->reset),
> + "Couldn't get reset control\n");
> + }
I'd remove these curly braces for consistency with the code above.
regards
Philipp
