gpio-keys already 'inherits' the interrupts from the controller
of the specified GPIO, so having another declaration is redundant.
On >=v5.15 this started causing an oops under gpio_keys_probe as
the IRQ was already claimed.
Signed-off-by: Mathew McBride <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 418962eea358 ("arm64: dts: add device tree for Traverse Ten64 (LS1088A)")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1088a-ten64.dts | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1088a-ten64.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1088a-ten64.dts
index 3063851c2fb9..d3f03dcbb8c3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1088a-ten64.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1088a-ten64.dts
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ buttons {
powerdn {
label = "External Power Down";
gpios = <&gpio1 17 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
- interrupts = <&gpio1 17 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
linux,code = <KEY_POWER>;
};
@@ -46,7 +45,6 @@ powerdn {
admin {
label = "ADMIN button";
gpios = <&gpio3 8 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
- interrupts = <&gpio3 8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
linux,code = <KEY_WPS_BUTTON>;
};
};
--
2.30.1
