On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 09:36:59AM -0500, Adam Ford wrote: > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 3:11 PM Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 4:19 PM Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 4:02 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:04:14 -0600, Adam Ford wrote: > > > > > Add binding doc for fsl,spba-bus. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > make dt_binding_check -j8 |grep spba > > > > > DTEX Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/fsl,spba-bus.example.dts > > > > > DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/fsl,spba-bus.example.dt.yaml > > > > > CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/fsl,spba-bus.example.dt.yaml > > > > > > > > > > V5: Rebase on 5.10-rc2 to be able to check yaml > > > > > Add Reg entry > > > > > > > > > > V4: Remove an accidental makefile change > > > > > Move type:object under additional properties > > > > > > > > > > V3: Rebase sample from aips-bus example > > > > > Split off from series adding i.MX8M Nano functions to reduce noise > > > > > > > > > > V2: Attempted to update yaml from feedback > > > > > > > > > > > > > Applied, thanks! > > > > > > Rob, > > > > > > I am not seeing this anywhere. Can you tell me where this was > > > applied? It's not appearing in Linux-next > > > > Rob, > > > > Patchwork shows this has been accepted [1], however I don't see that > > it's still applied. > > > > > > [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20201118230414.121316-1-aford173@xxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Can you apply it? It looks like building the device tree is throwing > > messages because this is missing. > > > > Shawn, > > Since you're the maintainer for the IMX stuff, can I update the > MAINTAINERS file to add this yaml file under the IMX section? When > building device trees, it throws a bunch of splat because this patch > was never applied, and checkpatch is showing it wants a maintainer. checkpatch warning on maintainer shouldn't be a problem. We don't really want to bloat IMX entry in MAINTAINERS. Shawn
