On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 1:24 PM Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Some charger/battery vendors describe the temperature impact to > battery capacity by providing tables with capacity change at > given temperature. Support providing this temperature - capacity > dependency using the simple-battery DT nodes. > > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Since we already support providing the capacity at different temperatures using ocv-capacity-celsius and the array of arrays ocv-capacity-table-0, 1, 2... you are introducing a second parallel method of describing how capacity changes in accordance with temperature, right? What do you expect to happen if someone specifies both? If this is an either/or situation then the schema has to guarantee the exclusiveness for each. (I would probably just use the formula you have to calculate a few tables using the existing method but that's just me.) Yours, Linus Walleij
