On Thu, 2021-11-11 at 10:13 +0800, Lei Yu wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 6:29 AM Andrei Kartashev
> <a.kartashev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +
> > +&fmc {
> > + status = "okay";
> > + flash@0 {
> > + status = "okay";
> > + label = "bmc";
> > + m25p,fast-read;
> > + partitions {
> > + compatible = "fixed-partitions";
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > + u-boot@0 {
> > + reg = <0x0 0x80000>; // 512KB
> > + label = "u-boot";
> > + };
> > +
> > + fit-image-a@80000 {
> > + reg = <0x80000 0x1b80000>; // 27.5MB
> > + label = "image-a";
> > + };
> > +
> > + sofs@1c00000 {
> > + reg = <0x1c00000 0x200000>; // 2MB
> > + label = "sofs";
> > + };
> > +
> > + rwfs@1e00000 {
> > + reg = <0x1e00000 0x600000>; // 6MB
> > + label = "rwfs";
> > + };
> > +
> > + u-boot-env@2400000 {
> > + reg = <0x2400000 0x20000>; // 128KB
> > + label = "u-boot-env";
> > + };
> > +
> > + fit-image-b@2480000 {
> > + reg = <0x2480000 0x1b80000>; //
> > 27.5MB
> > + label = "image-b";
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > +};
>
> The flash layout is not the same as the openbmc static layout, but
> like the one used by Intel-BMC.
> May I ask if you are going to upstream the bmc-code-update related
> changes for this layout?
Yeh, we got to this mess, so now it is not easy to change, so we have
to deal with Intel-BMC layout.
We have our own utility to manage firmware:
https://github.com/YADRO-KNS/obmc-yadro-fwupdate
What to do with updates through webui, I don't know yet.
> > +&i2c0 {
> > + /* SMB_IPMB_STBY_LVC3 */
> > + multi-master;
> > + general-call;
> > + aspeed,dma-buf-size = <4095>;
> > + aspeed,hw-timeout-ms = <300>;
>
> These properties are not available in openbmc linux kernel tree, but
> used in Intel-BMC/linux, may I ask if you are going to upstream the
> related changes?
>
Thank you for pointing this, will remove in next revision.
> > + status = "okay";
> > +};
> > +
>
--
Best regards,
Andrei Kartashev
