On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 5:46 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This does break DT ABI compatibility which is partially mitigated if > these changes are backported to stable. The alternative is reverting the > referenced DT changes and coming up with different node names without > unit-addresses. Ultimately, ABI issues are platform maintainers' > decision, not mine. I don't mind breaking the ABI for these boards since everyone I know rebuild the DT with the kernel and boot. I don't know if other users flash it though, so check what Sudeep says. Yours, Linus Walleij
