Il giorno gio 28 ott 2021 alle ore 12:35 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto: > > On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:18:32 +0200 > Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > This patch introduces ABI documentation for new iio modifiers used for > > reporting "linear acceleration" measures. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@xxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio | 8 ++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio > > index 6ad47a67521c..5147a00bf24a 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio > > @@ -1957,3 +1957,11 @@ Description: > > Specify the percent for light sensor relative to the channel > > absolute value that a data field should change before an event > > is generated. Units are a percentage of the prior reading. > > + > > +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_accel_linear_x_raw > > +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_accel_linear_y_raw > > +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_accel_linear_z_raw > > +KernelVersion: 5.15 > > +Contact: linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > +Description: > > + Raw (unscaled) linear acceleration readings. > > Probably need more information that this. What element is being 'removed' from > a normal acceleration measurement? What are units after application of offset and > scale? Can cross refer to the in_accel_x_raw for that info if you like. OK. So, may I just state something like "As per in_accel_X_raw attributes, but minus the gravity acceleration" ? > Also, but them immediately after the block with the in_accel_x_raw etc OK > The organization fo that file needs a rethink but let us try to avoid making > it worse in the meeantime! > > Jonathan > >
