On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 02:46:24PM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote: > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,tcsr.txt | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,tcsr.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,tcsr.txt > index e90519d566a3..c5f4f0ddfcc3 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,tcsr.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,tcsr.txt > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ registers via syscon. > > Required properties: > - compatible: Should contain: > + "qcom,tcsr-ipq6018", "syscon", "simple-mfd" for IPQ6018 > "qcom,tcsr-ipq8064", "syscon" for IPQ8064 > "qcom,tcsr-apq8064", "syscon" for APQ8064 > "qcom,tcsr-msm8660", "syscon" for MSM8660 I wonder about why qcom,tcsr-ipq6018 should use simple-mfd, but the others don't. Assuming there is a deeper reason, mentioning that in the commit log (or depending on the reason maybe even in the binding?) sounds sensible. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
