2014-08-02 13:30 GMT+02:00 Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi, > >> res = platform_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); >> irq = platform_get_irq(dev, 0); >> - if (res == NULL || irq < 0) { >> - ret = -ENODEV; >> - goto eclk; >> - } >> + if (res == NULL || irq < 0) >> + return -ENODEV; > > No need to check for valid 'res' here... > >> >> - if (!request_mem_region(res->start, resource_size(res), res->name)) { >> - ret = -ENOMEM; >> - goto eclk; >> - } >> + if (!devm_request_mem_region(&dev->dev, res->start, >> + resource_size(res), res->name)) >> + return -ENOMEM; > > ... and no need to use 'devm_request_mem_region' ... > >> - i2c->reg_base = ioremap(res->start, resource_size(res)); >> - if (!i2c->reg_base) { >> - ret = -EIO; >> - goto eremap; >> - } >> + i2c->reg_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&adev->dev, res)); >> + if (IS_ERR(i2c->reg_base)) >> + return -EIO; > > ... because devm_ioremap_resource does all that for you. Also, don't > return -EIO but the PTR_ERR given from the function. Just check other > drivers how they do it. > >> >> i2c->reg_ibmr = i2c->reg_base + pxa_reg_layout[i2c_type].ibmr; >> i2c->reg_idbr = i2c->reg_base + pxa_reg_layout[i2c_type].idbr; >> @@ -1227,10 +1218,12 @@ static int i2c_pxa_probe(struct platform_device *dev) >> i2c->adap.algo = &i2c_pxa_pio_algorithm; >> } else { >> i2c->adap.algo = &i2c_pxa_algorithm; >> - ret = request_irq(irq, i2c_pxa_handler, IRQF_SHARED, >> - dev_name(&dev->dev), i2c); >> - if (ret) >> - goto ereqirq; >> + ret = devm_request_irq(&dev->dev, irq, i2c_pxa_handler, >> + IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(&dev->dev), i2c); >> + if (ret) { >> + clk_disable_unprepare(i2c->clk); >> + return ret; > > Maybe you should make a error path with 'goto' out of it... > > >> + } >> } >> >> i2c_pxa_reset(i2c); >> @@ -1244,7 +1237,7 @@ static int i2c_pxa_probe(struct platform_device *dev) >> ret = i2c_add_numbered_adapter(&i2c->adap); >> if (ret < 0) { >> printk(KERN_INFO "I2C: Failed to add bus\n"); >> - goto eadapt; >> + return ret; > > ... since you forgot disable_unprepare here and could simply reuse it. > > >> } >> >> platform_set_drvdata(dev, i2c); >> @@ -1257,20 +1250,6 @@ static int i2c_pxa_probe(struct platform_device *dev) >> dev_name(&i2c->adap.dev)); >> #endif >> return 0; >> - >> -eadapt: >> - if (!i2c->use_pio) >> - free_irq(irq, i2c); >> -ereqirq: >> - clk_disable_unprepare(i2c->clk); >> - iounmap(i2c->reg_base); >> -eremap: >> - clk_put(i2c->clk); >> -eclk: >> - kfree(i2c); >> -emalloc: >> - release_mem_region(res->start, resource_size(res)); >> - return ret; >> } > > You forgot to cleanup the remove function. > > BTW I forgot, can you test this patch on real hardware? If not, is there > somebody who does? > > All the best, > > Wolfram Hi I have made a lot of changes on changes to changes, and have really tried to ensure that all would be right. But I feel like that's enough, Wolfram or anyone else may end this. And no as I replied earlier, I lack this kind of hardware... Kind regards Rickard Strandqvist -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html