On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 14:56, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 8:43 PM Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +static const u32 jh7100_reset_asserted[4] = {
>
> > + BIT(JH7100_RST_U74 % 32) |
> > + BIT(JH7100_RST_VP6_DRESET % 32) |
> > + BIT(JH7100_RST_VP6_BRESET % 32),
>
> It's hard to notice that this is only one entry. See also below.
Yeah, so what would be a better way to style it?
> > + BIT(JH7100_RST_HIFI4_DRESET % 32) |
> > + BIT(JH7100_RST_HIFI4_BRESET % 32),
> > +
> > + BIT(JH7100_RST_E24 % 32)
>
> + Comma.
>
> > +};
>
> Why all these ugly % 32 against constants?
Because the JH7100_RST_ values goes higher than 31. There is a
BIT_MASK macro, but that does % BITS_PER_LONG and this is a 64bit
machine.
> ...
>
> > + if (!assert)
> > + done ^= mask;
>
> Can you convert this to simple
>
> if (assert)
> ret = readl_...
> else
> ret = readl_...
>
> below?
I don't see how that would work. We're using the done value in in the
readl_poll_timeout. Maybe you can be a bit more explicit.
The reason is that for most reset lines a 0 in the status register
means it's asserted and a 1 means it's deasserted. For the few reset
lines above this is reversed though.
/Emil
