Hello Rob, On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 at 23:14, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 19:57:46 +0200, Etienne Carriere wrote: > > Introduce compatible "linaro,scmi-optee" for SCMI transport channel > > based on an OP-TEE service invocation. The compatible mandates a > > channel ID defined with property "linaro,optee-channel-id". > > > > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Changes since v3: > > - Add description for linaro,optee-channel-id in patternProperties > > specifying protocol can optionaly define a dedicated channel id. > > - Fix DTS example (duplicated phandles issue, subnodes ordering) > > - Fix typo in DTS example and description comments. > > > > Changes since v2: > > - Define mandatory property linaro,optee-channel-id > > - Rebased on yaml description file > > > > Changes since v1: > > - Removed modification regarding mboxes property description. > > --- > > .../bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml | 66 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+) > > > > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): > > yamllint warnings/errors: > > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: > /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.example.dt.yaml: sram@51000000: 'optee-shm-section@0' does not match any of the regexes: '^([a-z]*-)?sram(-section)?@[a-f0-9]+$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' > From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml > > doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs): > > See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1544001 > > This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch > series is generally the most recent rc1. > > If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above > error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to > date: > > pip3 install dtschema --upgrade > > Please check and re-submit. > For info, i've upgraded dtsschemas, tested on v5.15-rc6 but don't get any error. Yet, i'll fix the DTS example accordingly in the v5. Regards, Etienne