On 2021-10-17 16:29, Trevor Woerner wrote:
On Sat 2021-10-16 @ 10:45:04 PM, Johan Jonker wrote:
On 10/16/21 5:45 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
Add an operating-points table and cooling entry to the GPU on the
RK3328 SoC to improve its performance. According to its datasheet[1]
the maximum frequency of the Mali-450 MP2 GPU found on the RK3328 SoC
is 500MHz.
On my rock64 device, under x11, glmark2-es2 performance increased from
around 60 to just over 100. Same device running glmark2-es2 under
wayland/weston improved from just over 100 to just over 200.
[1] https://rockchip.fr/RK3328%20datasheet%20V1.2.pdf
Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi
index 8c821acb21ff..5e1dcf71e414 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi
@@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ map0 {
cooling-device = <&cpu0 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>,
<&cpu1 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>,
<&cpu2 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>,
- <&cpu3 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>;
+ <&cpu3 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>,
+ <&gpu THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>;
contribution = <4096>;
};
};
@@ -617,6 +618,29 @@ gpu: gpu@ff300000 {
clocks = <&cru ACLK_GPU>, <&cru ACLK_GPU>;
clock-names = "bus", "core";
resets = <&cru SRST_GPU_A>;
+ operating-points-v2 = <&gpu_opp_table>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
+ };
+
+ gpu_opp_table: gpu-opp-table {
After the conversion to YAML of the Operating Performance Points(OPP)
binding the operating-points-v2 property expects the nodename to have
the '^opp-table(-[a-z0-9]+)?$' format.
make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2.yaml
Thanks, I wasn't aware.
+ compatible = "operating-points-v2";
+
+ opp-200000000 {
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <200000000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ };
+ opp-300000000 {
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <300000000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ };
+ opp-400000000 {
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <400000000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ };
+ opp-500000000 {
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <500000000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ };
};
opp-microvolt has the same value for every node vs. table below?
On page 1 of the schematic for the rock64
https://files.pine64.org/doc/rock64/ROCK64_Schematic_v3.0_20181105.pdf is a
table ("Power Timing") showing BUCK1 at 1.1V. I interpreted this to mean that
VDD_LOG should always be at 1.1V, regardless of frequency.
No, that's just the default voltage that BUCK1 itself starts up at -
looks like that table is an unfinished attempt to summarise the Power
Sequence section from the RK805 datasheet.
See also previous discussion:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/3c95c29b-6c07-5945-ac22-d683997e1ca0@xxxxxxx/
Is that now fixed/checked?
I wasn't aware of the previous/on-going discussion regarding a gpu opp table
for this SoC. Perhaps that explains my suspicions? I couldn't help wonder why
the frequency is always reported as 163840000 even when I have an opp table
that only has the 500MHz entry?
FWIW the usual culprit for clocks not changing is inadvertently not
having devfreq and/or the simple_ondemand governor enabled. However, I
do seem to recall that devfreq doesn't explicitly fix up an out-of-spec
clock to a known OPP on startup like cpufreq does - I think it only
actually touches the clocks and regulators when transitioning between
OPPs, so if it only has one it might possibly end up in a pathological
state where that effectively never happens; I don't remember exactly.
Unfortunately all my boards are out of action for various reasons at the
moment so I can't readily check how I was running mine, but from memory
I think I ended up with slightly tweaked voltages based on a survey of
several other BSP kernels, and the 200-300MHz points just disabled to
avoid undervolting the memory controller once lima voltage scaling was
working properly.
Cheers,
Robin.
I'll investigate whether I can prove or disprove the scaling is actually
occurring?
Best regards,
Trevor
