Hi Horatiu, On Mon, 2021-10-18 at 10:57 +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote: > On lan966x platform when the switch gets reseted then also the sgpio > gets reseted. The fix for this is to extend also the sgpio driver to > call the reset driver which will be reseted only once by the first > driver that is probed. > > Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c > index 072bccdea2a5..78765faa245a 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ > #include <linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h> > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > #include <linux/property.h> > +#include <linux/reset.h> > > #include "core.h" > #include "pinconf.h" > @@ -803,6 +804,7 @@ static int microchip_sgpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > int div_clock = 0, ret, port, i, nbanks; > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; > + struct reset_control *reset; > struct sgpio_priv *priv; > struct clk *clk; > u32 val; > @@ -813,6 +815,11 @@ static int microchip_sgpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > priv->dev = dev; > > + reset = devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared(&pdev->dev, "switch"); This is the first GPIO driver that I am aware of that requests a named reset control, so I'm still not sure if this should be called "switch" instead of "gpio" or just "reset", just in case there is a future model where the GPIO controller reset is not shared with the switch reset. > + if (IS_ERR(reset)) > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(reset), "Failed to get reset\n"); > + reset_control_reset(reset); > + > clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL); > if (IS_ERR(clk)) > return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(clk), "Failed to get clock\n"); But whichever name you choose, the code is Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> regards Philipp
