> Apple SoCs such as the M1 come with various co-processors. Mailboxes
> are used to communicate with those. This driver adds support for
> two variants of those mailboxes.
>
> Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sven Peter <sven@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In the future, Reviewed-by tags should be dropped after making major
changes to a patch.
> + writel_relaxed(apple_mbox->hw->irq_bit_recv_not_empty |
> + apple_mbox->hw->irq_bit_send_empty,
> + apple_mbox->regs + apple_mbox->hw->irq_enable);
Nit: weird wrapping, much easier to read as:
+ writel_relaxed(apple_mbox->hw->irq_bit_recv_not_empty |
+ apple_mbox->hw->irq_bit_send_empty,
+ apple_mbox->regs + apple_mbox->hw->irq_enable);
> +static const struct apple_mbox_hw apple_mbox_asc_hw = {
> + .control_full = APPLE_ASC_MBOX_CONTROL_FULL,
> + .control_empty = APPLE_ASC_MBOX_CONTROL_EMPTY,
> +
> + .a2i_control = APPLE_ASC_MBOX_A2I_CONTROL,
> + .a2i_send0 = APPLE_ASC_MBOX_A2I_SEND0,
> + .a2i_send1 = APPLE_ASC_MBOX_A2I_SEND1,
> +
> + .i2a_control = APPLE_ASC_MBOX_I2A_CONTROL,
> + .i2a_recv0 = APPLE_ASC_MBOX_I2A_RECV0,
> + .i2a_recv1 = APPLE_ASC_MBOX_I2A_RECV1,
> +
> + .has_irq_controls = false,
> +};
Nit: consider dropping the `has_irq_controls = false` assignment.
Clearly there are none, or you'd have to fill out the irq_* fields too.
> +static const struct of_device_id apple_mbox_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "apple,t8103-asc-mailbox", .data = &apple_mbox_asc_hw },
> + { .compatible = "apple,t8103-m3-mailbox", .data = &apple_mbox_m3_hw },
> + {}
> +};
No generic compatibles? I assume this driver hasn't changed much in
recent iPhones, and hopefully it won't change much in M1X...
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR MIT */
> +/*
> + * Apple mailbox message format
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2021 The Asahi Linux Contributors
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _LINUX_APPLE_MAILBOX_H_
> +#define _LINUX_APPLE_MAILBOX_H_
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +struct apple_mbox_msg {
> + u64 msg0;
> + u32 msg1;
> +};
> +
> +#endif
Given this file lacks the context of the driver, and the questions
raised in v2 review, it might be beneficial to add a quick comment to
apple_mbox_msg explaiing that no, really, this is a 96-bit message.
