Ping (Olof or Matt?) On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Brian Norris <computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 09:30:40AM +0100, Russell King wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 02:07:58PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: >> > From: Marc Carino <marc.ceeeee@xxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > Add the UART definitions needed to support earlyprintk on brcmstb machines. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Marc Carino <marc.ceeeee@xxxxxxxxx> >> > Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> >> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> I noticed that you sent this to the patch system. I asked Olof last >> night whether he had anything in arm-soc touching Kconfig.debug, and >> he does (a number of other platforms have updated it.) This means >> that if I apply it to my tree, it may conflict, so I'm reluctant to >> take it. > > OK... Matt told me that such patches go through you. So which is it? > Should all Kconfig.debug patches go through the arm-soc route? How should this get in? Should I rebase/resend through Matt and arm-soc? Or can you pick this up as-is? Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
