Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2021-10-14 17:46:51) > On Thu 14 Oct 17:25 PDT 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2021-10-14 17:15:39) > > > On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 03:04, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2021-10-14 02:53:41) > > > > > On 13/10/2021 22:50, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > > > Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2021-10-07 09:16:13) > > > > > >> On 07/10/2021 18:48, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > > > > >>> On Sun 29 Aug 08:47 PDT 2021, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>> Now as the common qcom clock controller code has been taught about power > > > > > >>>> domains, stop mentioning mmcx supply as a way to power up the clock > > > > > >>>> controller's gdsc. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > >>>> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Once we merge these, I expect that the boards will start crashing if > > > > > >>> the kernel is booted using an existing DTB? > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Is it okay to just merge the first 6 patches in the series now and > > > > > >>> postpone these two until we've had the dts change sitting for a while? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Sure it is. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > What's the merge strategy? It goes through arm-soc? > > > > > > > > > > I think this should go through the clk tree. There is little chance of > > > > > conflicts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > The other thing that concerns me is that we don't have backwards > > > > compat code. If things are going to start crashing that's not very nice. > > > > Is there some way to make it work with old and new DTB for one release > > > > so that we don't have to worry about this problem? > > > > > > I have to admit that I did not check that, but without the patch 7 the > > > dispcc and videocc would be compatible with the old DTB. The 'supply = > > > "mmcx"' would ensure that it is used if it is defined. > > > > > > > So I can skip patch 7 and take everything else? > > If you take patch 1-5 and I pick up patch 6 for v5.16 then we should > have transitioned with backwards compatibility. > Ok. Sounds like a deal.
