On 12-10-21, 14:34, Hector Martin wrote: > The table *is* assigned to a genpd (the memory controller), it's just that > that genpd isn't actually a parent of the CPU device. Without the patch you > end up with: > > [ 3.040060] cpu cpu4: Failed to set performance rate of cpu4: 0 (-19) > [ 3.042881] cpu cpu4: Failed to set required opps: -19 > [ 3.045508] cpufreq: __target_index: Failed to change cpu frequency: -19 Hmm, Saravana and Sibi were working on a similar problem earlier and decided to solve this using devfreq instead. Don't remember the exact series which got merged for this, Sibi ? If this part fails, how do you actually set the performance state of the memory controller's genpd ? -- viresh
