hi Krzysztof,
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 3:05 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The compatible "issi,is25wp256" is undocumented and instead only a
> generic jedec,spi-nor should be used (if appropriate).
Why not do it the other way around? I mean adding this compatible to
the expected list: don't we lose information using the generic
compatible?
Thanks,
Alex
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> Changes since v1:
> 1. New patch
> ---
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts | 2 +-
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts
> index 60846e88ae4b..633b31b6e25c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ &i2c0 {
> &qspi0 {
> status = "okay";
> flash@0 {
> - compatible = "issi,is25wp256", "jedec,spi-nor";
> + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
> reg = <0>;
> spi-max-frequency = <50000000>;
> m25p,fast-read;
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts
> index 2e4ea84f27e7..9b0b9b85040e 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts
> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ vdd_ldo11: ldo11 {
> &qspi0 {
> status = "okay";
> flash@0 {
> - compatible = "issi,is25wp256", "jedec,spi-nor";
> + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
> reg = <0>;
> spi-max-frequency = <50000000>;
> m25p,fast-read;
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
