On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 7:30 AM Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Adam, > > Am Montag, dem 11.10.2021 um 07:25 -0500 schrieb Adam Ford: > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 10:45 AM Tim Harvey <tharvey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 6:28 PM Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Tim: > > > > Just as Ahmad mentioned, Lucas had issue one patch-set to support i.MX8MM PCIe. > > > > Some comments in the review cycle. > > > > - One separate PHY driver should be used for i.MX8MM PCIe driver. > > > > - Schema file should be used I think, otherwise the .txt file in the dt-binding. > > > > > > > > I'm preparing one patch-set, but it's relied on the yaml file exchanges and power-domain changes(block control and so on). > > > > Up to now, I only walking on the first step, trying to exchange the dt-binding files to schema yaml file. > > > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > Richard Zhu > > > > > > Richard / Ahmad, > > > > > > Thanks for your response - I did not see the series from Lucas. I will > > > drop this and wait for him to complete his work. > > > > > > > Tim, > > > > It appears that the power domain changes have been applied to Shawn's > > for-next branch: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shawnguo/linux.git/log/?h=for-next > > > > Is there any chance you could rebase and resend this series? > > This wasn't about the power domain series. I also tried to get i.MX8M > PCIe upstream, but the feedback was that we need to split out the PHY > functionality, Richard is currently working on this. There is no point > in resending this series. Sorry. I missed that part. adam > > Regards, > Lucas >
