Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: ti,gpmc: Convert to yaml

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxxxxxx> [211011 07:04]:
> Hi Tony,
> 
> On 11/10/2021 08:53, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [211009 14:56]:
> >> On 08/10/2021 21:10, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >>> Krzysztof,
> >>>
> >>> On 07/10/2021 20:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>>> On 07/10/2021 14:08, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This series converts ti,gpmc memory controller and ti,gpmc-nand and
> >>>>> ti,gpmc-onenand MTD controller bindings to yaml.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> cheers,
> >>>>> -roger
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> Although you did not mention it here, it looks like you have some
> >>>> dependencies between the patches. Maybe this shall go simply via Rob's tree?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Rob has acked all the DT binding patches.
> >>> So it is upto you and Miquèl to decide the best way. MTD tree or Memory controller tree
> >>> for the dt-bindings patches.
> >>>
> >>> The ARM: dts changes should go via Tony's OMAP SoC tree.
> >>>
> >>> Or if Tony is OK with it then maybe all patches can go via Tony's tree? :)
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> I reviewed the two memory-controller patches, so feel free to take them
> >> via MTD or OMAP SoC.
> > 
> > Sounds like I should pick up these because of the dts changes.
> 
> There is no dependency with the dts patches but it would be great if you can pick them all up.

OK all pushed out now to omap-for-v5.16/gpmc.

Thanks,

Tony



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux