Re: [PATCH] of: Allow mem_reserve of memory with a base address of zero

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wed, 6 Aug 2014 17:02:44 -0500, Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Al Cooper <alcooperx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > __reserved_mem_reserve_reg() won't reserve memory if the base address
> > is zero. This change removes the check for a base address of zero and
> > allows it to be reserved.
> >
> > Allowing the first 4K of memory to be reserved will help solve a
> > problem on some ARM systems where the the first 16K of memory is
> > unused and becomes allocable memory. This will prevent this memory
> > from being used for DMA by drivers like the USB OHCI driver which
> > consider a physical address of zero to be illegal.
> 
> OHCI driver or hardware? I agree with the change, but really think
> this should be fixed in the driver in the former case or a property of
> the OHCI node in the latter.

I'm not hard and fast on that. I don't think it is unreasonable to
reserve the base of memory as the platform level if there is a bug
causing DMA to fail at that address.

If this is a common problem (and not merely a few boards) then I agree.
Fixing it this way is just asking for the same problem to show up again
and again on new boards that haven't explicitly reserved the memory.

g.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux