Yeah, this one patch is nonsense. Sending new patch series adding
compatible to the IPQ40xx/AP-DK01.1-C1 instead of accepting generic
board compatible.
David
On Sun, Sep 19 2021 at 23:19:19 -0500, Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu 09 Sep 01:04 CDT 2021, David Heidelberg wrote:
It seems that some ipq4019 boards just accepted architecture.
Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@xxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
index 5169ebb97946..9b6dd7dc3825 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
@@ -174,6 +174,9 @@ properties:
- qcom,ipq4019-dk04.1-c1
- const: qcom,ipq4019
It seems reasonable to expect that the board isn't just a
"qcom,ipq4019"
and in that case I believe this should cover all boards.
Please let me know if I'm misunderstanding things.
Regards,
Bjorn
+ - items:
+ - const: qcom,ipq4019
+
- items:
- enum:
- qcom,ipq8064-ap148
--
2.33.0
