Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>> >> >> I'm not really fond of having this kind of ASCII based parser in the
>>> >> >> kernel. Do you have an example compressed file somewhere?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > An example of uncompressed configuration file can be found here[1]. Once
>>> >> > compressed with [2], you get:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > {a:{a:4,b:1},b:{a:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:A},b:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:B},c:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:C},d:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:D},e:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:E},f:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:F},g:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:G},h:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:H},i:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:I},j:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:J},k:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:K},l:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:1,e:L},m:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:1,e:M}},c:{a:{a:4},b:{a:6},c:{a:6,c:0},d:{a:6},e:{a:6},f:{a:6}},e:{b:0,c:1},h:{e:0,a:50,b:0,d:0,c:[{a:1,b:[0,0,0,0,0,0]},{a:2,b:[0,0,0,0,0,0]},{a:[3,9],b:[0,0,0,0,0,0]},{a:A,b:[0,0,0,0,0,0]},{a:B,b:[0,0,0,0,0,0]},{a:[C,D],b:[0,0,0,0,0,0]},{a:E,b:[0,0,0,0,0,0]}]},j:{a:0,b:0}}
>>> >>
>>> >> So what's the grand idea with this braces format? I'm not getting it.
>>> >
>>> > - It allows to describe a tree structure
>>> > - It is ascii (easy to dump, easy to copy-paste)
>>> > - It is small (as I explain below, size matters)
>>> > - Since it is similar to JSON, the structure is obvious to many people
>>> >
>>> > Anyway, I am not the author of that and I have to deal with it.
>>>
>>> I'm a supported for JSON like formats, flexibility and all that. But
>>> they belong to user space, not kernel.
>>>
>>> >> Usually the drivers just consider this kind of firmware configuration
>>> >> data as a binary blob and dump it to the firmware, without knowing what
>>> >> the data contains. Can't you do the same?
>>> >
>>> > [I didn't had received this mail :( ]
>>> >
>>> > The idea was also to send it as a binary blob. However, the firmware use
>>> > a limited buffer (1500 bytes) to parse it. In most of case the PDS exceeds
>>> > this size. So, we have to split the PDS before to send it.
>>> >
>>> > Unfortunately, we can't split it anywhere. The PDS is a tree structure and
>>> > the firmware expects to receive a well formatted tree.
>>> >
>>> > So, the easiest way to send it to the firmware is to split the tree
>>> > between each root nodes and send each subtree separately (see also the
>>> > comment above wfx_send_pds()).
>>> >
>>> > Anyway, someone has to cook this configuration before to send it to the
>>> > firmware. This could be done by a script outside of the kernel. Then we
>>> > could change the input format to simplify a bit the processing in the
>>> > kernel.
>>>
>>> I think a binary file with TLV format would be much better, but I'm sure
>>> there also other good choises.
>>>
>>> > However, the driver has already some users and I worry that changing
>>> > the input format would lead to a mess.
>>>
>>> You can implement a script which converts the old format to the new
>>> format. And you can use different naming scheme in the new format so
>>> that we don't accidentally load the old format. And even better if you
>>> add a some kind of signature in the new format and give a proper error
>>> from the driver if it doesn't match.
>>
>> Ok. I am going to change the input format. I think the new function is
>> going to look like:
>>
>> int wfx_send_pds(struct wfx_dev *wdev, u8 *buf, size_t buf_len)
>> {
>> int ret;
>> int start = 0;
>>
>> if (buf[start] != '{') {
>> dev_err(wdev->dev, "valid PDS start with '{'. Did you forget to compress it?\n");
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> while (start < buf_len) {
>> len = strnlen(buf + start, buf_len - start);
>> if (len > WFX_PDS_MAX_SIZE) {
>> dev_err(wdev->dev, "PDS chunk is too big (legacy format?)\n");
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> dev_dbg(wdev->dev, "send PDS '%s'\n", buf + start);
>> ret = wfx_hif_configuration(wdev, buf + start, len);
>> /* FIXME: Add error handling here */
>> start += len;
>> }
>> return 0;
>
> Did you read at all what I wrote above? Please ditch the ASCII format
> completely.
Sorry, I read this too hastily. I just saw "buf[start] != '{'" and
assumed this is the same ASCII format, but not sure anymore. Can you
explain what changes you made now?
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
