Marc, Jason already created a branch irqchip/gic-v2m, which I have created my patch against. So, what branch do you want me to re-create a patch against for you to review? Suravee -----Original Message----- From: Marc Zyngier [mailto:marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 3:12 AM To: Suthikulpanit, Suravee Cc: Mark Rutland; jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Pawel Moll; Catalin Marinas; Will Deacon; tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kasiviswanathan, Harish; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] irqchip: gic-v2m: Rework GICv2m Initialization Hi Suravee, On 09/08/14 00:17, suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx wrote: > From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx> > > This patch set reworks the GICv2m initialization based on Marc Zyngier > review comments. > > * Rebase to git://git.infradead.org/users/jcooper/linux.git > irqchip/gic-v2m > > Suravee Suthikulpanit (1): > irqchip/gic-v2m: Restructure the initalization code for v2m > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 37 +++++++-- > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c | 115 +++++++++----------------- > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 30 +++---- > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.h | 10 +-- > 4 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-) > While I appreciate that you're trying to reduce the amount of stuff we review, it is actually much easier to look at the patch series as a whole, rather then as a diff against the previous version. Please squash this into your original series and repost it with a log of what has changed in the cover letter. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
