Hei hei,
Am Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 03:39:51AM +0000 schrieb Stephen Boyd:
> Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2021-06-22 20:50:38)
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-qcom-lpg.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-qcom-lpg.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..10aee61a7ffc
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-qcom-lpg.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
> [....]
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + #include <dt-bindings/leds/common.h>
> > +
> > + lpg {
>
> Should the node name be led or leds?
If I scan through Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds and look at
other devices, it should probably be named "led-controller", right?
At least that's what Rob suggested when I converted the leds-pwm
binding last year, using generic node names:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20200922155747.GA2734659@bogus/
Greets
Alex
>
> > + compatible = "qcom,pmi8994-lpg";
>
> Shouldn't there be a reg property? I see the driver has them hardcoded
> but if this is a child of the spmi node then it should have a reg
> property (or many reg properties).
