On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 04:37:45PM +0200, Paweł Anikiel wrote: > On SoCFPGA systems, it's desireable to have fixed numbering for > i2c busses, while being able to enable/disable them (e.g. have i2c1 > be mapped to /dev/i2c-1, even though i2c0 is disabled). This can also > be achieved using devicetree aliases (see i2c_add_adapter). However, > having the driver be self-contained without relying on aliases is more > robust. Why? This number means nothing, user space has another means to have this being robust. Sorry, but I don't see any even close to good enough justification, NAK. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
