On 04-10-21, 10:01, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > If you wrote the patch, then Angelo handled it, then you handled it > again the double S-o-b captures that nicely. > > Looking it from the other angle, if you remove the first S-o-b, then you > forgot to signed it off when you authored the original patch and if you > skip the last S-o-b then you didn't adequately sign off the final > result. Hmm, interesting that it can be looked this way. I am wondering if between 10 different versions two people ping pong the ownership of the patch, then will we need to capture 5-5 signed-off-by's from each of them :) >From my understanding, that I had until now, the list of tags specify who all performed what different roles in the patch development/submission and when did that happen (sort of timeline), so last tag is added by the new handler of the patch. But adding two signed-off-by's by a single guy looks fishy, though it may actually be correct :) -- viresh
