On 12:54-20211004, Rob Herring wrote: > On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 03:14:28PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > Maintain consistency in K3 SoCs by allowing AM654 and AM642 platforms > > just state SoC compatibles without specific board specific compatibles > > aligned with what we have done for J721E/J7200 platforms as well. > > This is the wrong direction IMO. Why do you want this other than > alignment? Many downstream boards tend not to have an specific compatible at least during initial phase and I would like folks to start using checks to make sure that the easy to catch issues via match against bindings are already handled. I am curious as to why you think this is wrong - because we permit an alternative option that allows the board files to be less specific? [...] -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D)/Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
