On 9/30/21 10:47 AM, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
Hi Marek
On 9/29/21 1:18 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 9/27/21 1:45 PM, Olivier Moysan wrote:
Fix SAI2B pin muxing for AV96 board on STM32MP15.
The label "sai2a-4" is defined twice. Change redundant label to
"sai2b-4".
Fixes: dcf185ca8175 ("ARM: dts: stm32: Add alternate pinmux for SAI2
pins on stm32mp15")
Signed-off-by: Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15-pinctrl.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15-pinctrl.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15-pinctrl.dtsi
index 5b60ecbd718f..b9cc9e0dd4fc 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15-pinctrl.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15-pinctrl.dtsi
@@ -1235,7 +1235,7 @@
};
};
- sai2b_pins_c: sai2a-4 {
+ sai2b_pins_c: sai2b-4 {
pins1 {
pinmux = <STM32_PINMUX('F', 11, AF10)>; /* SAI2_SD_B */
bias-disable;
This mp1 pinmuxing is a total mess, sigh.
What is the issue here ?
The same-old discussion about where to place the pinmux nodes, whether
we should have these clusters of pre-defined options in ...pinctrl.dtsi,
or whether we should do more nxp-like per-board configuration.
