On Sun, 26 Sept 2021 at 20:33, Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Ahmad, > > On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 08:54:35 +0200 > Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hello Andreas, > > > > On 24.09.21 11:14, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > > > Binding specification only allows one compatible here. > > > > This same change was NACKed by Lucas here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/72e1194e10ccb4f87aed96265114f0963e805092.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > I also think the schema should be fixed instead. > > > well, that argumentation makes sense. Feel free to drop this patch. I > will not repost the series if it is just about dropping patches. The argument of using a new DTB with an old kernel, therefore prohibiting changes in new DTB, does not make that much sense, except when caring about other systems which would like to directly reuse the DTB... anyway it's not that important to fight over it. Best regards, Krzysztof
